UMBC Legislative Testimony 2005

LEGISLATIVE TESTIMONY

Freeman A. Hrabowski, III
President
The University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC)
February 2007

Our Vision | The State of the University | Students | Faculty
| Research | Professional Education and Service | Technology Development | Private Giving
| Summary of FY 2007 Budget Request | Response to Legislative Analyst's Comments | Issues


OUR VISION:
Academic Excellence, Economic Development,
and Social Vitality

I am delighted to report to you on UMBC’s progress and to respond to questions you may have regarding our FY 2007 and FY 2008 budgets.

UMBC is a public research university, emphasizing graduate programs in the sciences, engineering, public policy, and human services, and building on a strong undergraduate liberal arts and sciences core. We are distinctive among the nation’s research universities because of our emphasis on undergraduate education, reflecting our tradition of linking research and teaching. It was especially gratifying when a recent New York Times editorial praised UMBC for “rocking the house” in math and science education. We are an exciting campus with a bold vision and entrepreneurial spirit. It is an amazing story that we have come so far so fast, in just 40 years. Your investment in us has generated a high return for the State, and we are determined to continue attracting and educating growing numbers of students who will enter Maryland’s workforce and reflect the diversity of our State.

We also are recognized increasingly as a major resource for both building the State’s economy and addressing its social concerns. We foster economic development primarily through (1) research and training-related contracts and grants; (2) technology development, including the activities of bwtech@UMBC (our research-and-technology park) and techcenter@UMBC (our technology center); (3) partnerships involving continuing education and business outreach; and (4) workforce development.
We now enroll approximately 11,800 students (including 9,400 undergraduates); employ approximately 1,810 full-time and 370 part-time faculty and staff; have an operating budget of roughly $318 million, including $85 million annually in research-and-training contracts and grants; and we have more than 45,000 alumni, nearly three-quarters of whom live and work in Maryland and contribute to its economic and social vitality. We offer bachelor’s and selected master’s and Ph.D. programs in the physical and life sciences, social and behavioral sciences, engineering, mathematics, information technology, education, and the humanities and visual and performing arts. The new Erickson School, focused on aging studies, was recently created with a $5-million private pledge and $5 million in State support.

Brainpower and talent are fueling discoveries and innovation on campus, and increasingly we are building on these strengths by collaborating with others. We are creating multi-level partnerships to connect faculty and students with companies, agencies, foundations, and school systems. Recent examples of how these partnerships have enabled us to leverage State funds include (1) renovating biology and chemistry facilities with added support from the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH); (2) building first-rate biochemistry laboratories through our partnership with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI); (3) developing major new research centers with support from NASA (we continue to rank among the leading universities nationally in terms of NASA funding) and such companies as Northrop Grumman, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, and IBM; (4) contributing in the policy arena in gerontology (through the Erickson School), the environment (through the Center for Urban Environmental Research & Education), health care (through the Center for Health Policy Development & Management), and teacher education (through the Center for History Education) with support from a variety of Federal and State agencies; and (5) strengthening campus life by constructing impressive new residence halls with private support.

A particularly exciting new partnership with IBM (which we expect to finalize shortly) will establish UMBC as a center of excellence in cell computing. This initiative will be only the second such center established in the nation (the first is at Georgia Tech). The new center will position the campus as a research and education leader for the next generation of high-performance computing and will enhance our ability to attract top science and technology talent. The center will also increase our capacity to support high-performance computing needs of companies and State and Federal agencies, including particularly those coming to Maryland through the BRAC process.
We also are excited about a recent $2-million investment by the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation in UMBC’s Alex. Brown Center for Entrepreneurship, which will enable us to infuse innovation and leadership across the curriculum. The Kauffman Foundation is working to cultivate entrepreneurship in settings outside of business schools, and UMBC was one of only nine campuses recently selected, along with Arizona State, Brown, Carnegie Mellon, Georgetown, NYU, Purdue, Syracuse, and the University of Wisconsin, Madison
.

back to top


THE STATE OF THE UNIVERSITY:
Facing Challenges From a Position of Strength

We continue our rapid development as a major research university. In fact, the National Science Foundation ranks UMBC 147th nationally in federally funded research in science and engineering (up from 200th in 1996) (Figure 4). This leap is especially significant because most of the other nationally ranked institutions are substantially larger and older (and often include medical centers).

Figure 4

Figure 4

We also are among a relatively small number of colleges and universities with a Phi Beta Kappa chapter (we were one of the youngest campuses ever to earn this distinction), reflecting our strength in the liberal arts, and we remain the only public campus in Maryland with a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator. The campus also is a two-time recipient of the U.S. Presidential Award for Excellence in Science, Mathematics and Engineering Mentoring. We also rank third nationally (based on NSF data) in the number of information technology and computer science degrees awarded and have been designated a Center of Academic Excellence in Information Assurance by the National Security Agency. We also are among a small number of universities to have received both a multi-million-dollar National Science Foundation ADVANCE grant, in recognition of our strengths in preparing women in science and engineering (we also were named one of the “Best 50 Colleges for Women” by CosmoGIRL! magazine), and a major grant through NSF’s Alliances for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) program to prepare more minority Ph.D.s in science. We have become a national model for preparing students of all backgrounds in science and engineering, including especially minorities and women, at a time when the nation is focusing intensely on securing and strengthening its position in the global economy and America’s demographic profile is shifting dramatically.

While our State-supported budget has grown, overall, in recent years, so too has the campus. Since 2000, the number of full-time-equivalent students increased from nearly 8,100 to 9,291 (15%) (Figure 1); sponsored contracts and grants grew by a third, from $64 million to $85 million (Figure 3); total degrees conferred per year increased from approximately 1,800 to almost 2,200 (22%); and the number of students living on campus increased 62% – from 2,350 to 3,800 – and from one-third to nearly half of our full-time undergraduate population, including more than three-quarters of our freshmen.

Figure 1

Figure 1


Figure 3

Figure 3


While these kinds of changes have contributed to UMBC’s continuing transformation, they also have generated new demands on our operations that seriously tax our capacity to respond. One way the campus has responded is by emphasizing efficiency and effectiveness measures. For the current year, our efforts have produced several millions of dollars in savings or cost avoidance through business improvements, outsourcing, energy management, external partnerships, and new revenue generation.

Our current strengths and solid foundation reflect the efforts and commitment of State leaders, our faculty, staff, and students, and years of careful thinking, ambitious planning, and hard decisions, with support from the University System and the Board of Regents and our Board of Visitors. We have managed for results, and the State’s investment and confidence in us have yielded solid returns
.

back to top


THE UMBC COMMUNITY:
Quality, Achievements, Contributions

STUDENTS
Our student body is among the most diverse nationally (40% minority, including 21% Asian, 15% African American, and 4% Hispanic and Native American). The freshman class of 1,432 students includes hundreds of valedictorians, 4.0 students, and students with SAT scores at the highest end (above 1550), demonstrating our increasing attractiveness to high-achieving students and the success of our special scholars programs—the Humanities Scholars, Linehan Artist Scholars, Sondheim Public Affairs Scholars, Meyerhoff Scholars, and Center for Women & Information Technology Scholars programs.

The graduate population of approximately 2,380 students includes an increased number of domestic students (83%), women (53%), and minorities (20%). Our doctoral enrollments remain strong, and we continue to attract large numbers of working professionals to master’s programs responsive to the growing needs of businesses, school systems, and other employers.

Our total headcount enrollment of 11,798 represents an increase of 148 students above our headcount total a year ago and has produced an annual FTE enrollment of 9,291 in FY 2007, 118 above our total in FY 2006 and 78 below our projected increase of 196 FTE students this year. Among our challenges in building enrollment are UMBC’s relatively small program base (Figure 2), fluctuations in the information technology market, and a continuing loss of out-of-state students because of higher tuition costs. The campus is aggressively responding by implementing a variety of strategies, including adding several relatively inexpensive and often-requested undergraduate programs (e.g., media and communications studies), initiating new master’s programs for working professionals, expanding teacher education options and financial support, and increasing investment in getting our message out to prospective students. We are encouraged that these efforts have helped us to narrow the gap between projected and actual enrollments this year and that applications for fall 2007 are up substantially.

Figure 2

Figure 2


Producing well-prepared graduates for Maryland's workforce is one of UMBC's most important and lasting contributions to economic development. Graduates move easily into the workforce in areas related to their majors – from engineering and IT firms to public and social service agencies and public school systems throughout the State

Student Scholarship, Achievement, and Intellectual Competition
Providing undergraduates with wide-ranging opportunities for research, creative achievement, and intellectual competition both on and off campus is a vital part of our culture. As a result, the student body includes Goldwater and Jack Kent Cooke Scholars, Merck, NSF GEM, and Bell Labs/Lucent Technologies Fellows, several Fulbright winners, and a National Geographic intern. Other students have received prestigious awards from the American Mathematics Society, the Center for Medieval Studies at the University of York (England), and the American College Theatre Festival. UMBC’s National Society of Black Engineers chapter won the national Academic Technical Bowl Competition for the second year in a row. And this past April, our much-heralded Chess Team won the President’s Cup in the “Final Four” of college chess. Finally, the NCAA’s 2006 Academic Progress Report ranked our women’s swim team and men’s basketball and cross country teams in the top ten percent of colleges and universities nationally.

Well Prepared Graduates
Thousands of area physicians, attorneys, teachers, scientists, engineers, IT workers, artists, policy-makers, and other professionals are among UMBC alumni. The National Security Agency (NSA), for example, employs hundreds of UMBC math, computer science, and language graduates. The campus will continue producing large numbers of graduates in these and other areas responsive to Maryland’s workforce needs, including many graduates who are active in business start-ups and work in local entrepreneurial ventures. Our graduates contribute directly to the quality and supply of the State’s workforce, two of the most critical factors in relocation decisions by companies.

Particularly noteworthy are data from the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (ASBMB) showing that UMBC ranked first nationally in the total number of undergraduate chemistry and biochemistry degrees awarded to African Americans in 2004-05 (18 degrees). The ASBMB also ranked UMBC seventh nationally in overall chemistry and biochemistry degree production (63 degrees) and fourth nationally in the total number of chemistry and biochemistry degrees awarded to Asian Americans (23 degrees)
.

back to top


FACULTY
UMBC has approximately 550 State-supported full-time faculty members who teach and conduct research, 198 full-time research faculty funded from contracts and grants, and 301 part-time faculty. They are dedicated to their students and their work and are accountable through a rigorous process of review for promotion and tenure. Because of our emphasis on hands-on experiences for students, faculty work to connect to students not only through teaching, but also in their research. These experiences lead to substantive faculty-student interaction in labs, studios, and other settings, and to student internships.

Awards & Recognition
Another measure of the quality of our faculty is its impressive per capita ranking for such major competitive awards as Fulbright, Guggenheim, and National Endowment for the Humanities Fellowships, comparing favorably, for example, with William & Mary, the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, and the University of Virginia (Figure 5). In fact, UMBC has recently had several Fulbright Scholars, an NIH Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers winner, a U.S. Department of State Jefferson Science Fellow, a Mellon Research Fellow, a Woodrow Wilson Career Enhancement Fellow, a National Endowment for the Arts Fellow, an American Association for the Advancement of Science Mentoring awardee, several NSF Career Award winners, an Optical Society of America Fellow, an IBM Faculty Award winner, and the Maryland Chemist of the Year. UMBC faculty members also are consistently among the recipients of the prestigious NSF Career Awards for young scientists. During 2001-05, our faculty held more career awards than colleagues at Yale, Cal Tech, Brandeis, and Tufts. Faculty members also have won a variety of major awards and distinctions from leading professional and disciplinary organizations.

Figure 5

Figure 5

As State support for higher education has fluctuated over the years, chiefly because of changes in the economy, faculty hiring also has fluctuated and has not been commensurate with enrollment increases, new programs, and institutional plans and aspirations. The size and quality of UMBC’s faculty will largely determine for many years our level of success as a research university. We must continue to hire outstanding faculty to meet enrollment shifts, replace retiring faculty, and replace faculty we lose to other universities and corporations with whom we compete intensely.

It is important not only to build our faculty complement, but also to retain faculty by providing the necessary support structure for research and teaching and competitive salaries. Faculty drive the campus’s research enterprise, attracting revenue-generating grants and contracts, creating research opportunities for graduate and undergraduate students, and developing new knowledge and innovations leading to technology transfer. Retaining faculty is important also because of the costs associated with replacing them.

back to top


Research
We help to anticipate and shape the future by producing new knowledge through the faculty’s research – either individually or through partnerships with corporations or public agencies. The authors of The Top American Research Universities, An Annual Report from The Lombardi Program on Measuring University Performance (2004), state that research institutions change very slowly over time, and yet their data on Federal research expenditures show that among major research universities in the nation, UMBC’s rise in the rankings exceeded that of all other institutions between 1993 and 2002. Our research is important, in part, not only because it addresses scientific, technological, and public-policy issues facing society, but also because it gives our undergraduate and graduate students opportunities to work with us on these issues – from AIDS and computer security to Medicaid policies and the K-12 academic achievement gap. Faculty members also publish cutting-edge articles and books across the academic spectrum.

One reason for the faculty’s rising productivity has been the creation of several research centers. This past year, for example, UMBC has been collaborating with Princeton, Rice, Johns Hopkins, and Texas A&M Universities on a new Engineering Research Center (ERC) on Mid-Infrared Technologies for Health and the Environment funded by the National Science Foundation. The Center is developing engineering technologies using light for ultra-sensitive chemical sensing that will have important public-health and environmental applications. The ERC’s work, involving our Center for Advanced Studies in Photonics Research (CASPR), whose Director serves as the consortium’s Deputy Director, will create opportunities for undergraduate and graduate students and will also likely result in new product lines and markets. Other major research initiatives are being conducted by our Center for Urban Environmental Research & Education (CUERE), Howard Hughes Medical Institute Laboratory, Goddard Earth Sciences & Technology (GEST) Center, Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology (JCET), Center for History Education, Center for Art, Design, and Visual Culture, and the Maryland Institute for Policy Analysis & Research (MIPAR). UMBC enjoys a particularly strong relationship with NASA. In fact, we rank seventh nationally among universities in NASA funding. NASA’s support continued to grow this year, with a new, five-year cooperative agreement establishing the Center for Research and Exploration in Space Science and Technology. The partnership links UMBC, the University of Maryland-College Park, the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, and the Universities Space Research Association in astrophysical exploration.

back to top

PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION, TRAINING, and SERVICE
Consistent with our mission, we also serve as a center of professional development, working with agencies and business and industry in the Baltimore-Washington region. Some of our major partners include school systems in the Baltimore-Washington corridor, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Maryland’s Department of Business & Economic Development (DBED), and NSA. Through UMBC Training Centers, LLC, and our Division of Continuing & Professional Studies, we offer individuals and organizations customized credit and non-credit certificate, training, and graduate programs on-campus, on-site, online, and at the Universities at Shady Grove in Rockville.

We are especially committed to developing effective K-16 initiatives. One such initiative is the recent $10-million, multi-year Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education Project involving UMBC, the Baltimore County Public Schools, and NSF to strengthen student achievement and teacher proficiency in STEM fields in selected high-needs elementary, middle, and high schools. This work will be expanded and strengthened through a $5-million gift from George and Betsy Sherman establishing the Sherman STEM Teacher Scholars Program at UMBC. The program will dramatically increase the number of UMBC graduates who move immediately to public school teaching careers in science, math, and technology. Another example is the work of our Center for History Education, which has won approximately $5 million in grants from the U.S. Department of Education in conjunction with public school systems in Baltimore City, Anne Arundel, Baltimore, and Howard Counties, among others, to help strengthen history instruction in elementary, middle, and high schools. Other examples include our partnerships with both the Anne Arundel and Howard County Public Schools to provide professional development programs for scores of teachers in mathematics, science, English, and ESOL, and the work of our Center for Art, Design, and Visual Culture, which works with area schools to strengthen arts education for K-16 students. In partnership with the Montgomery County Public Schools and Montgomery College, we also recently helped to launch The Institute for Global and Cultural Studies at Wheaton High School. The program not only challenges students to deepen their understanding of the world, but also builds students’ college-readiness skills in reading, writing, and research. Qualified students may enroll in free college courses offered at Wheaton and can earn guaranteed admission to UMBC and Montgomery College.

Our Center for Health Program Development & Management (CHPDM) is a multi-faceted health services research organization. Under contract with Maryland’s Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DHMH), the Center has become nationally recognized for its work in helping Maryland control costs and improve the quality of healthcare in the State. The Center works with DHMH and other public and private organizations in developing and evaluating healthcare programs and policies. Similarly, our Shriver Center continues to provide applied experiences each year for more than 1,000 students through internships, co-ops, and community service positions in hundreds of organizations in the U.S. and abroad. The Center has attracted millions of dollars in grants and contracts in recent years from national and State agencies and foundations, and is serving hundreds of at-risk youth through its nationally acclaimed Choice Program
.

back to top


TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
We have been a model for developing partnerships focused on technology development and commercialization. The campus operates two major complexes to support these growing activities – techcenter@UMBC and bwtech@UMBC – and our faculty, staff, and students work actively with business, industry, and government in combining our public responsibility with our technical expertise.

The techcenter@UMBC includes five buildings located on 30 acres and houses approximately 170,000 square feet of research, office, and conference facilities. Located on I-95, just minutes from BWI Airport and within view of thousands of north- and southbound travelers daily, the facility (UMBC’s South Campus) leases space to more than two dozen early-stage biotech and IT/engineering-related firms employing more than 200 workers. For its incubator companies, the center provides a variety of university resources, including low-cost office/lab space, shared administrative services, access to UMBC’s library and computing resources, access to faculty expertise, and availability of business, legal, marketing, and technical advice. The General Assembly, DBED, and Baltimore County all strongly supported UMBC’s efforts to acquire these facilities, which are an excellent example of UMBC’s collaboration with business and government in the interest of economic development and enhancing the region’s quality of life.

The 41-acre bwtech@UMBC, located immediately adjacent to our central campus, includes two major facilities and now has development commitments for its remaining three sites. The existing 62,500-square-foot RWD Technologies’ Applied Technology Lab, with its staff of 250, and a 60,000-square-foot multi-tenant building, completed in fall 2004, will soon be joined by the U.S. Geological Survey regional water science center, a 110,000-square-foot multi-tenant facility developed by Corporate Office Properties Trust, and a $20-million building being constructed by Erickson Retirement Communities to house its Retirement Living cable television channel and its IT division. A recent, independent study (by the Sage Policy Group, Inc.) of the economic impact of bwtech@UMBC and techcenter@UMBC reports that 841 jobs are located in the facilities, and that these employees are engaged in work that has produced more than 2,000 additional jobs statewide. The study also reports an $11 return in tax revenue on each State dollar invested. Moreover, both the techcenter@UMBC and bwtech@UMBC emphasize tenant interaction with faculty, staff, and students, and those interactions are on the rise. Over the past two years, on-campus tenant companies have employed 127 students as interns and part-time staff and 70 UMBC alumni. In addition, more than 70 faculty members have research collaborations and other partnership activities with tenant companies.

Our Office of Technology Development is housed in bwtech@UMBC and works closely with tenant companies. It also plays a vital role in supporting our new ACTiVATE initiative, an applied training program for women seeking to become technology entrepreneurs. The program, established in 2005 with a three-year, $600,000 NSF grant and support from the Maryland Technology Development Corporation (TEDCO) and corporate sponsors, has trained 41 women and launched eight companies based on technology developed at Maryland universities and federal labs.

Finally, we continue pursuing strategies for commercializing faculty inventions and technology transfer designed to contribute to economic development and garner new resources for the campus, in addition to supporting local companies. Increased emphasis on identifying applied uses of faculty research and on faculty collaboration with industry has resulted in increased invention disclosures. In fact, The Business Gazette has reported that UMBC has “fared better than the industry standard, receiving one invention disclosure for $1.45 million of research.” Success also with our licensing efforts has substantially increased our licensing revenue over the past few years.

back to top


PRIVATE GIVING
I am delighted to report that our fundraising efforts continue to be very successful. We completed our first capital campaign in June, 2002, raising $66 million (and surpassing our five-year, $50-million goal by nearly a third). This past September, we announced a $100-million capital campaign. Although we are the youngest member of the University System of Maryland, our fundraising goal is the third highest in the System. We have already raised $72 million toward our goal, and with $17 million pledged so far this year, FY 2007 is already our best fundraising year ever. Our current endowment (as of December 31, 2006) exceeds $48 million, a dramatic increase over the past decade when our endowment totaled only $3.6 million. Major gifts by corporations, foundations, alumni, faculty, and staff both during our first campaign and since its completion have built endowment support (Figure 6) for student scholarships, faculty research, endowed professorships, faculty and staff development, and other programmatic initiatives ranging from the sciences and engineering to teacher preparation, the arts, and community service.

Figure 6

Figure 6


Our success in fundraising is particularly significant because Maryland, unlike other states (e.g., Virginia, North Carolina), has not enjoyed a long tradition of private giving to public institutions. (In fact, before 1990, the campus had never raised a million dollars in any year.) We consistently set aggressive fundraising goals and have worked especially hard to surpass them. We have consistently demonstrated that top-flight programmatic initiatives – led by faculty and staff – can attract donors, and our successes have helped the public understand the difference that private giving and endowment can make. Alumni, corporations, and all Maryland citizens can take pride in our privately supported achievements.

back to top




SUMMARY
of FY 2008 Budget Request

Operating Budget
UMBC’s FY 2008 budget request of $325.1 million reflects an increase of $7.5 million (2.4%) over FY 2007. The change is due primarily to a $4.2-million increase (5.3%) in the State General Fund appropriation. Tuition revenue is generated by a budgeted enrollment of 9,369 FTE students and reflects a one-percent increase over our FY 2007 actual enrollment of 9,291 FTE students. Auxiliary and self-supporting operating-unit revenue increases $1.4 million (3.2%), in part through direct sales by various units, and by fee increases identified in the tuition and fee schedule. Resources will be allocated to expand summer and winter course offerings, and to continue enhancing student life outside the classroom.

The FY 2008 funding increases are required to meet such mandatory expenses as wages and fringe benefit increases; higher utility, facilities renewal, insurance, and debt-service costs; need-based financial aid responsive to access initiatives; instructional support and student services costs related to higher enrollments; and increased technology support costs
.

Capital Budget
UMBC is grateful that the Governor’s proposed capital budget for FY 2008 includes $3.625 million for design development of a Performing Arts and Humanities Facility. The proposed facility will provide space to meet the current and future curricular, research, and student-life needs of the UMBC community and will house the Departments of Theater, Music, Dance, Ancient Studies, English, and Philosophy, as well as the Shakespeare Association of America (which resides at UMBC) and our Center for the Humanities. (It is significant that the plans for the new facility proved instrumental in a recent half-million-dollar gift to name and expand the role of the Center for the Humanities.)

Intended primarily as a facility for teaching and research in the arts and humanities, the Performing Arts and Humanities Facility will play a large and essential role in our required general education curriculum. It is so central to our academic mission that virtually every undergraduate will use the facility’s classroom and spaces. Maryland employers often remind us how important it is that our graduates, whether in science and engineering or the liberal and fine arts, be able to think and communicate clearly – writing, speaking, problem-solving, and thinking critically and creatively. Our arts and humanities departments and programs provide such a foundation for all of our students, in the process educating well rounded citizens and strengthening Maryland’s workforce. In fact, we recently increased the writing requirements in our General Education Program (mandatory for all undergraduates), responding in part to industry’s needs for highly literate employees. These revisions to our General Education Program will make arts and humanities courses even more available and appealing to students in all fields, thereby increasing the demands on those departments that will be housed in the new facility. The facility also will be one of UMBC’s most public buildings, unique in southwest Baltimore County and the surrounding area, serving the needs of the Greater Baltimore community through performances and outreach activities. Indeed, the facility will be instrumental in creating a regional and national appreciation of UMBC as a cultural destination
.

back to top

RESPONSES
to Legislative Analyst's Comments on UMBC

Let me begin by reemphasizing some of the points made by the Chancellor and other colleagues regarding three issues of great importance to the System and our individual campuses: (1) enrollment funding, (2) program enhancement funding, and (3) the transfer of additional money to the fund balance.

In response to the DLS recommendation to reduce funding for enrollment growth, the Chancellor emphasized the importance of the MHEC Funding Guidelines in determining and meeting costs in order to maintain academic quality. We encourage the State to provide support for enrollment growth in keeping with the guidelines. Moving, as DLS suggests, to funding additional students on a “marginal” cost basis would diminish the quality of our academic programs if we continue to grow. The Chancellor has reminded us that our K-12 public education system is funded on an average cost basis in order to maintain quality, and we should fund our public universities in the same fashion. On our campus, the enrollment funding has been critical to maintain academic quality, while expanding access. We are committed to increasing enrollment to help absorb the baby-boom echo and a growing number of students coming from Maryland’s community colleges. A loss of funds would prevent the designated growth institutions from appropriately serving those additional students and providing them with the support they need to succeed (e.g., hiring faculty to teach more students, ensure course availability, and control class size to avoid delaying time-to-degree, while also offering students advising, tutoring, counseling, and other services).

In response to the DLS recommendation to reduce funding for program enhancements, the Chancellor pointed out that the proposed reduction would essentially eliminate funding for genuine enhancements related to important strategic priorities for our State. We concur, especially knowing that UMBC’s proposed program enhancement funding of $500,000 would provide critically needed support for programs that meet student and workforce demands in the sciences, engineering, and economics – programs that have experienced substantial enrollment growth in recent years without commensurate increases in support.

Finally, in response to the Analyst’s recommendation to transfer additional funding to the fund balance at the end of FY 2008, the Chancellor noted that the proposed transfer would be tantamount to cutting the budget because it would make the dollars unavailable to spend on key priorities. He also noted that this is a very tight budget, with a net increase in the State-supported budget of only 3.4% (2.6% for UMBC). While there is a 6.8% increase in General Funds (plus one-time health care savings), that is only half the funding revenue for the State budget. The other half is tuition, and with the State’s desire to freeze in-state tuition rates this year, we cannot look to that source to cover our costs. It also is important to remember that the System has been very responsible in strategically managing its fund balance in order to maintain its high credit rating. UMBC concurs and is committed to setting aside one percent of its unrestricted funds to be placed in the fund balance by the end of FY 2008 (which is reflected in the Governor’s budget). At the same time, we find ourselves working hard to make ends meet, while satisfying both our one-percent fund balance requirement and the one-percent efficiency and effectiveness cost-reduction mandate. A requirement to set aside even more of our funds would seriously hamper our efforts to maintain the quality of our programs and expand access. UMBC is committed, for example, to addressing the shortage of highly qualified teachers (particularly in STEM fields) in K-12; a loss of funding, however, would make it much more challenging to continue to offer effective programs to provide professional development for current teachers.

OPERATING BUDGET ANALYSIS

Governor’s Proposed Budget – Issue
The President should comment on any progress UMBC has made in determining the correct research and public service expenditures.

Campus Response:
The analyst is correct in pointing out the differences in unrestricted Research and Public Service expenditures. Although total expenditures for FY 2006 in the Research and Public Service programs are correct, there is a question regarding distribution of unrestricted and restricted expenditures between the two programs. The following table shows what the actual FY 2006 expenditure distribution should have been:

 

Governor's

    Adjusted

 

Budget Request

  Corrections

  Actual

Research

 

 

 

   Unrestricted

$11,802,845

$(2,757,432)

$9,045,413

   Restricted

  40,032,928

    2,757,432

  42,790,360

      Total Research

$51,835,773

$0

$51,835,773

Public Service

 

 

 

   Unrestricted

$307,601

$   2,757,432

$3,065,033

   Restricted

  22,919,664

(2,757,432)

20,162,232

      Total Public Service

$23,227,265

$0

$23,227,254

Combined Programs

 

 

 

   Unrestricted

$12,110,446

 

$12,110,446

   Restricted

  62,952,592

 

62,952,592

       Total Combined Programs

$75,063,038

 

$75,063,038


When these adjustments are considered, the difference between the FY 2006 actual expenditures and the FY 2007 budgeted expenditures is all but eliminated in the Public Service program and significantly reduced in the Research program.

Regarding the differences between the FY 2007 budgeted expenditures and the FY 2008 requested unrestricted expenditures for the Research and Public Service programs, they are primarily the result of adjustments to the Governor’s FY 2008 allowance made for one-time cost savings in FY 2008 for retirees’ health insurance premiums. The adjustments totaled $311,000 for the Research program and $152,000 for the Public Service program. When we take these adjustments into consideration, the difference between budgeted expenditures for FY 2007 and FY 2008 is reduced to 1.6% in the Research program and 6.0% in the Public Service program.

back to top

ISSUES

Erickson School of Aging Studies
The President should comment on the projected operating deficit of the Erickson School of Aging Studies (in FY 2010 and 2011), as well as where funds will come from if there is a deficit. Since revenues come from enrolled students, the President should also comment on enrollment projections for the school.

Campus Response:
In our planning, which has been conservative, we have consistently envisioned the Erickson School of Aging Studies being fully self-supporting. The revenue estimates provided to DLS reflect conservative enrollment projections and levels of private giving and externally funded research that do not exceed current levels (even though we are optimistic about future developments in these areas). We also will effectively manage the Erickson School to ensure financial self-sufficiency and sustainability. In fact, the Erickson School staff includes individuals with substantial experience managing large, self-sustaining organizations both inside and outside of higher education. Part of the School’s effective management thus far includes having initially hired a number of faculty members on contractual term appointments (even though they are qualified for tenured full professorships). These new faculty members have agreed to join the Erickson School because of its distinctive vision and bright future involving teaching, research, and service. The Erickson School’s future reflects, in part, the close relationships it is developing with the seniors-housing industry and other key organizations in aging services (e.g., Social Security Administration, Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services, AARP).

Enrollment projections have been an important aspect of our planning, and we have considered different scenarios, including ones with lower projections. In these scenarios, we have identified ways to reduce expenses, if needed, and maintain financial viability. We are, however, optimistic about future enrollments given our growing relationships with businesses and agencies in this field and market demands for undergraduate and graduate training, executive education, and professional programs.

Affordability
The President should comment on future plans to award more aid to students with greater financial need as well as whether a student’s EFC (expected family contribution) is a factor in what type of and how much institutional aid is awarded.

Campus Response:
We are committed to increasing the base of our need-based financial aid funding by at least 10 percent annually We achieved this goal in FY 2007, and our budget for FY 2008 continues this trend.

In FY 2008, we will focus special attention on addressing the needs of transfer students, our neediest population of students, by providing a need-based scholarship to every transfer student whose financial need is minimally equivalent to the total estimated cost of tuition and fees, and who has earned at least a 3.0 grade point average at the community college level.

Although students who are eligible for Pell grants may have the lowest expected family contribution, we find that their financial need is usually met with a variety of other Pell-based programs, for example the Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant (SEOG), Federal Academic Competitiveness Grant (ACG), and the Federal SMART (Science & Mathematics Access to Retain Talent) Grant. Among our most needy students are those whose expected family contribution is just beyond the eligibility threshold for Pell Grants and is not addressed by other Federal and State aid programs. We continue to work strategically to supplement the financial aid of students who demonstrate significant need, but whose expected family contribution is too high for them to be eligible for Federal aid programs.

back to top

 



 Navigation: Home / AboutUMBC / Welcome / testimony2007 / index.html

Copyright © 2008 The University of Maryland, Baltimore County
1000 Hilltop Circle Baltimore, MD 21250
phone: 410-455-1000 email: help@umbc.edu