Federal Public
Law 100-679 requires a Disclosure Statement (DS-2) of cost accounting
practices from any institution of higher education that receives
$25 million or more in sponsored agreements/awards.
The institutions must demonstrate adherence to Cost Accounting Standards
(CAS) as stated in Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular
A- 21, Cost Principles for Institutions of Higher Education.
The DS-2 is intended
to clarify the cost accounting practices that the institution
follows or proposes to follow. The DS-2 describes the methodology
for distinguishing direct costs from facilities and administrative
costs (also known as indirect costs) and identifies the methodology
for cumulating and allocating the facilities and administrative
costs.
Disclosure Statement Information for Cost Accounting Practices
Federal Public Law 100-679 requires a Disclosure Statement (DS-2)
of cost accounting practices from any institution of higher education
that receives $25 million or more in sponsored agreements/awards.
The institutions must demonstrate adherence to Cost Accounting
Standards (CAS) as stated in Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
Circular A-21, Cost Principles for Institutions of Higher Education.
The DS-2 is intended to clarify the cost accounting practices
that the institution follows or proposes to follow. The DS-2 describes
the methodology for distinguishing direct costs from facilities
and administrative costs (also known as indirect costs) and identifies
the methodology for cumulating and allocating the facilities and
administrative costs.
CAS 9905.501 -- Consistency in estimating, accumulating and
reporting costs by educational institutions.
Purpose
The purpose of this standard is to ensure that each educational
institution's practices used in estimating costs for a proposal
are consistent with cost accounting practices used by the educational
institution in accumulating and reporting costs. Consistency in
the application of cost accounting practices is necessary to enhance
the likelihood that comparable transactions are treated alike.
With respect to individual sponsored agreements, the consistent
application of cost accounting practices will facilitate the preparation
of reliable cost estimates used in pricing a proposal and their
comparison with the costs of performance of the resulting sponsored
agreement. Such comparisons provide one important basis for financial
control over costs during sponsored agreement performance and
aid in establishing accountability for costs in the manner agreed
to by both parties at the time of agreement. The comparisons also
provide an improved basis for evaluating estimating capabilities.
Definitions
A. The following are definitions of terms which are prominent
in this standard.
- Accumulating costs means the collecting of cost data in an
organized manner, such as through a system of accounts.
- Actual cost means an amount determined on the basis of cost
incurred (as distinguished from forecasted cost), including
standard cost properly adjusted for applicable variance.
- Estimating costs means the process of forecasting a future
result in terms of cost, based upon information available at
the time.
- Indirect cost pool means a grouping of incurred costs identified
with two or more objectives but not identified specifically
with any final cost objective.
- Pricing means the process of establishing the amount or amounts
to be paid in return for goods or services.
- Proposal means any offer or other submission used as a basis
for pricing a sponsored agreement, sponsored agreement modification
or termination settlement or for securing payments there under.
- Reporting costs means the providing of cost information to
others.
Fundamental Requirement
An educational institution's practices used in estimating costs
in pricing a proposal shall be consistent with the educational
institution's cost accounting practices used
in accumulating and reporting costs.
An educational institution's cost accounting practices used
in accumulating and reporting actual costs for a sponsored agreement
shall be consistent with the educational institution's practices
used in estimating costs in the related proposal or application.
The grouping of homogeneous costs in estimates prepared for
proposal purposes shall not per se be deemed an inconsistent application
of cost accounting practices of this paragraph when such costs
are accumulated in reported in greater detail on an actual costs
basis during performance of the sponsored.
CAS 9905.502 -- Consistency in allocating costs incurred for
the same purpose by educational institutions.
Purpose
The purpose of this standard is to require that each type of
cost is allocated only once and on only one basis to any sponsored
agreement or other cost objective. The criteria for determining
the allocation of costs to a sponsored agreement or other cost
objective should be the same for all similar objectives. Adherence
to these
cost accounting concepts is necessary to guard against the overcharging
of some cost objectives and to prevent double counting. Double
counting occurs most commonly when cost items are allocated directly
to a cost objective without eliminating like cost items from indirect
cost pools which are allocated to that cost
objective.
Definitions
(a) The following are definitions of terms which are prominent
in this standard.
Fundamental requirement
(a) Costs expressly unallowable or mutually agreed to be unallowable,
including costs mutually agreed to be unallowable directly associated
costs, shall be identified and excluded from any billing, claim,
application, or proposal applicable to a Government sponsored
agreement.
(b) Costs which specifically become designated as unallowable
as a result of a written decision furnished by a Federal official
pursuant to sponsored agreement disputes procedures shall be identified
if included in or used in the computation of any billing, claim,
or proposal applicable to a sponsored agreement. This identification
requirement applies also to any costs incurred for the same purpose
under like circumstances as the costs specifically identified
as unallowable under either this paragraph or paragraph (a) of
this subsection.
(c) Costs which, in a Federal official's written decision furnished
pursuant to disputes procedures, are designated as unallowable
directly associated costs of unallowable costs covered by either
paragraph (a) or (b) of this subsection shall be accorded the
identification required by paragraph b. of this subsection.
(d) The costs of any work project not contractually authorized,
whether or not related to performance of a proposed or existing
contract, shall be accounted for, to the extent appropriate, in
a manner which permits ready separation from the costs of authorized
work projects.
(e) All unallowable costs covered by paragraphs (a) through (d)
of this subsection shall be subject to the same cost accounting
principles governing cost allocability as allowable costs. In
circumstances where these unallowable costs normally would be
part of a regular indirect-cost allocation base or bases, they
shall remain in such base or bases. Where a directly associated
cost is part of a category of costs normally included in an indirect-cost
pool that will be allocated over a base containing the unallowable
cost with which it is associated, such a directly associated cost
shall be retained in the indirect-cost pool and be allocated through
the regular allocation process.
(f) Where the total of the allocable and otherwise allowable
costs exceeds a limitation-of-cost or ceiling-price provision
in a sponsored agreement, full direct and indirect cost allocation
shall be made to the cost objective, in accordance with established
cost accounting practices and Standards which regularly govern
a given entity's allocations to Government sponsored agreement
cost objectives. In any determination of unallowable cost overrun,
the amount thereof shall be identified in terms of the excess
of allowable costs over the ceiling amount, rather than through
specific identification of particular cost items or cost elements.
CAS 9905.506 -- Cost accounting period -- Educational institutions.
Purpose
The purpose of this standard is to provide criteria for the
selection of the time periods to be used as cost accounting periods
for sponsored agreement cost estimating, accumulating, and reporting.
This standard will reduce the effects of variations in the flow
of costs within each cost accounting period. It will also enhance
objectivity, consistency, and verifiability, and promote uniformity
and comparability in sponsored agreement cost measurements.
Definitions
(a) The following are definitions of terms which are prominent
in this standard.
(1) Allocate means to assign an item of cost, or a group of
items of cost, to one or more cost objectives. This term includes
both direct assignment of cost and the reassignment of a share
from an indirect cost pool.
(2) Cost Objective means a function, organizational subdivision,
sponsored agreement, or other work unit for which cost data are
desired and for which provision is made to accumulate and measure
the cost of processes, products, jobs, capitalized projects, etc.
(3) Fiscal year means the accounting period for which annual
financial statements are regularly prepared, generally a period
of 12 months, 52 weeks, or 53 weeks.
(4) Indirect cost pool means a grouping of incurred costs identified
with two or more cost objectives but not identified specifically
with any final cost objective.
Fundamental requirement
Educational institutions shall use their fiscal year as their
cost accounting period, except that:
Costs of an indirect function which exists for only a part of
a cost accounting period may be allocated to cost objectives of
that same part of the period.
An annual period other than the fiscal year may be used as the
cost accounting period if its use is an established practice of
the educational institution.
A transitional cost accounting period other than a year shall
be used whenever a change of fiscal year occurs.
An educational institution shall follow consistent practices
in the selection of the cost accounting period or periods in which
any types of expense and any types of adjustment to expense (including
prior-period adjustments) are accumulated and allocated.
The same cost accounting period shall be used for accumulating
costs in an indirect cost pool as for establishing its allocation
base, except that the contracting--------------parties may agree
to use a different period for establishing an allocation base.