News & Events


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on August 12, 2013 10:00 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Seminar: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 at 3:30 pm.

The next post in this blog is Seminar: Wednesday, Sept. 18, 2013 at 3:30 pm.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.34

« Seminar: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 at 3:30 pm | Main | Seminar: Wednesday, Sept. 18, 2013 at 3:30 pm »

PhD Defense - Patricia Sawamura

Patricia successfully defended her dissertation on August 12, 2013.

Retrieval of optical and microphysical properties of aerosols from a hybrid lidar dataset

Over the past decade the development of inversion techniques for the retrievals of aerosol microphysical properties (e.g. effective radius, volume and surface-area concentrations) and aerosol optical properties (e.g. complex index of refraction and single scattering albedo) from multiwavelength lidar system brought a new perspective in the study of the vertical distribution of aerosols. In this study retrievals of such parameters were obtained from a hybrid multiwavelength lidar dataset for the first time. In July of 2011, in the Baltimore-Washington DC region, synergistic profiling of optical and microphysical properties of aerosols with both airborne in-situ and ground-based remote sensing systems was performed during the first deployment of DISCOVER-AQ. The hybrid multiwavelength lidar dataset combines elastic ground-based measurements at 355 nm with airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar (HSRL) measurements at 532 nm and elastic measurements at 1064 nm that were obtained up to 5 km apart of each other. This was the first study in which optical and microphysical retrievals from lidar were obtained during the day and directly compared to AERONET and in-situ measurements. Good agreement was observed between lidar and AERONET retrievals. Larger discrepancies were observed between lidar retrievals and in-situ measurements obtained by the aircraft and aerosol hydration processes that were not taken into account in the study are believed to be the cause for the discrepancies observed.