Author:Mary E. Zynda, Teaching American History in Baltimore City Program
Grade Level:Upper Elementary/Middle
This lesson uses the Maryland State Constitution of 1776 and the Declaration of Independence to examine the contradiction between slavery and freedom at the heart of the American Revolution. The United States' founding fathers clamored for "liberty," "rights," and "freedom," yet incorporated slavery into the earliest constitutions. In Maryland's case, indentured servitude characterized the early labor force in the colony, but as soon as state legislators legalized life-long servitude for Africans, slavery became much more common. Despite early opposition to the institution and the campaigning of Christian abolitionist societies, slavery would accompany the United States' independence form Great Britain.
Era 3: Revolution and the New Nation (1754 - 1820's)
Standard 1: The causes of the American Revolution, the ideas and interests involved in forging the revolutionary movement, and the reasons for the American victory
Standard 2: The impact of the American Revolution on politics, economy, and society
Standard 3: The institutions and practices of government created during the Revolution and how they were revised between 1787 and 1815 to create the foundation of the American political system based on the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights
Historical Thinking Standards:
Standard 2: Historical Comprehension
B. Reconstruct the literal meaning of a historical passage.
C. Identify the central question(s) the historical narrative addresses.
E. Read historical narratives imaginatively.
Standard 3: Historical Analysis and Interpretation
B. Consider multiple perspectives.
Standard 4: Historical Research Capabilities
A. Formulate historical questions.
B. Obtain historical data from a variety of sources.
C. Interrogate historical data.
F. Support interpretations with historical evidence.
Standard 5: Historical Issues-Analysis and Decision-Making
E. Formulate a position or course of action on an issue.
The Declaration of Independence, I think, is one of the most remarkable documents in the world. . . 'Inalienable rights.'. . 'Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness'. . . 'We hold these truths to be self-evident.'. . . [But] it didn't apply to black folks. Thomas Jefferson kept slaves. But Thomas Jefferson nevertheless wrote these marvelous words, and he understood the inconsistency. . . .
General Colin Powell, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
“How is it,” asked Samuel Johnson, “that we hear the loudest yelps for liberty among the drivers of negroes?” Samuel Johnson was a British author who pointed out one of the central contradictions of the American Revolution, namely that many of the colonists who were fighting in the name of freedom were also slave owners, not the least of which was General George Washington. Many Europeans thought it was strange that a nation that was led by slave owners should be so insistent about its own freedom. Many colonists became aware of the contradiction involved in slaveholders fighting for their own freedom. “To contend for Liberty,” John Jay wrote, “and to deny that blessing to others involves an inconsistency not to be excused.” But even though the founders were aware of this moral contradiction, they incorporated it into their new nation anyway.
Yet after declaring independence, states such as Maryland enshrined slavery within the legal boundaries of the new governments they created, as they saw no contradiction between owning slaves and the fight for political freedom. The Maryland constitution of 1776, enacted just months after the issuance of the Declaration of Independence, included numerous references to ‘freedmen,’ and included human beings in the term property. To understand why Maryland, along with all the other former colonies, legalized slavery in their new constitutions while fighting in the name of freedom, the history of slavery in the new state has to be examined.
African servitude in Maryland occurred early in Lord Baltimore’s colony. The first African laborers arrived in the early 17th century, but their legal status was uncertain. By the 1660s, the status of Africans became clearer; some Africans became free after a term of servitude, and others remained slaves for life. Only three percent of the population were enslaved Africans in 1658 (Apple, Lampron, & Van Dyke, pg. 1). Shortly after that, the Maryland colonial assembly laid down the foundation for life long servitude as the common standard for Africans and for future children of enslaved African mothers. Many of these laws pertaining to the treatment of Africans passed after the arrival of immigrants from Barbados. In 1664 Maryland passed its first slave legislation. It stated that all “Negroes or other slaves hereafter imported into the province shall serve for life, as should their children. It also stated that any white woman who forgot her status and married a slave would have to serve the master of her husband. All children born into such a union would be slaves as well (Middleton, pg. 324).
As a middle state, Maryland provides a unique way of looking at slavery in the early United States. Slavery was more widespread in Maryland than in Pennsylvania or New England, but less prevalent than in southern states such as Virginia and South Carolina. Until the end of the seventeenth century, few slaves were actually imported to Maryland. The landowners preferred and relied on mainly white indentured servants to cultivate their crops, until tobacco became the staple crop in Maryland in the seventeenth century. After 1680 the purchase of slaves increased, because fewer whites were entering the colony. The abolition of the Royal African Company monopoly on trade influenced the increase in the buying of slaves in 1698. By the early 18th century, slaves made up about 25 percent of the colony’s population (Apple, et al., pg, 1).
The first African slaves grew tobacco and lived in groups of eight to twenty. Blacks developed and maintained strong families despite all of the uprooting and in-state migrations due to the slave trade within Maryland (Apple, pg. 2). They lived in quarter houses, outbuildings, and in surrounding tobacco fields. Some slaves lived in the same building as livestock. On the Eastern Shore of Maryland, planters by the 1750’s were using slaves to grow wheat, corn, and vegetables. Some slaves tended to livestock as well. Slaves were also used as craft workers and industrial laborers. Some of the jobs were in carpentry and even shipbuilding. Enslaved blacks thus played a major role in the expansion of Baltimore (Apple, et al., pg. 2). By the year 1810, Baltimore was the third largest city in the nation.
On the eve of the Revolution, the first group in America to address the problem of slavery was the Quakers. Many of them said that slavery was inconsistent with Christianity. The Quakers had a major part in the formation of the Pennsylvania Society for the Abolition of Slavery in 1775, which was the first antislavery society in America. The slave codes that existed in every colony deprived blacks of basic human rights; this in turn gave slave holders the opportunity for ruthless control over their slaves. While the Declaration of Independence stated, “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” this applied only to free men (and to a lesser extent free women), not slaves. During the 20 years that followed the adoption of the Declaration of Independence, each state acted as a separate sovereign entity under the Articles of Confederation was ratified. This meant that the future of slaves in a given state depended largely on the state’s constitution. Maryland’s constitution highlighted the conflict between the ideal of freedom and the reality of the new country (www.csusm.edu/Black_Excellence/documents/pg-s-a-revolution.html).
Within the state of Maryland some blacks gained freedom through manumission. Manumission was the legal action whereby a slaveholder gave or sold freedom to a slave. Before 1790, most of the manumissions granted to slaves in Maryland came from Quakers or Methodists who considered slaveholding evil (Whitman, pg. 3-4). Although rebellion against slavery was less common in colonial Maryland than in other colonies, there were still slaves that seized opportunities to flee to freedom in the North or join British forces during the American Revolution and the War of 1812.
A law was passed in Maryland in 1783, prohibiting the importation of slaves. James Otis, one of the early revolutionary leaders and a man who believed that the principles of the American cause should be extended to all Americans, including slaves, said, “It is a clear truth, that those who every day barter away other men’s liberty will soon care little for their own.” James Otis called the slave trade, “the most shocking violation of the law of nature.” In 1807 the Federal Government took action to terminate the trading of slaves from Africa. However, illegal trade across the Atlantic and domestic slave trading continued until the Civil War. It was not until the Civil War that slavery as an institution started to fade in Maryland.
When Maryland adopted its state constitution in 1776, the document pointedly provided numerous rights to freedmen, not all citizens. Property rights also included the possession of human beings serving in bondage. Each of the original Thirteen Colonies faced similar contradictions when they set out to create new governments. By examining these early documents it is clear that, despite the founders’ claim that they fought for the freedom of all men, they did not extend these rights to slaves in the new United States.
Apple, Sue Denhardt, Jeannette Lampron, and Judy Van Dyke, “Out of Slavery.” A Primary Source Kit from the Maryland Historical Society. Available for order online at http://www.mdhs.org/edu_cart.asp.
Fields, Barbara Jeanne, Slavery and Freedom on the Middle Ground: Maryland During the Nineteenth Century. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.
Kulikoff, Allan, Tobacco and Slaves: The Development of Southern Cultures in the Chesapeake, 1680-1800. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 1986.
Library of Congress, American Memories. Slaves and the Courts, 1740-1860. Case of the Slave Isaac Brown, An Outrage Exposed. <http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llst&fileName=002/llst002.db&recNum=0&i...> [accessed January 3, 2006].
Maryland State Constitution, 1776. <http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/states/ma02.htm> [accessed November 7, 2006].
Middleton, Richard, Colonial America, A History, 1585-1776. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.
Slavery and the American Revolution. http://www.csusm.edu/Black_Excellence/documents/pg-s-a-revolution.html [accessed May 4, 2006].
Walsh, Lorena, “Slave Life, Slave Society, and Tobacco Production in the Tidewater Chesapeake, 1620-1820.” In Cultivation and Culture: Labor and the Shaping of Slave Life in the Americas, eds. Ira Berlin and Philip D. Morgan. Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia, 1993.
Whitman, T. Stephen. The Price of Freedom: Slavery and Manumission in Baltimore and Early National Maryland
. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1997.
To force, compel, or oblige
To remove or withhold something
Freeing someone from the control of another
Prolonged separation from one's country or home
A person who is entitled to all the rights and privileges of citizenship
To challenge the validity of
The act of releasing a person from slavery
All able-bodied male citizens organized as part-time military units in case of emergency
The term used in the past to refer to individuals of African origin or their ancestors.
The legislature of Great Britain
To bring under complete control
The right to vote
Transcript of The Declaration of Independence.
[accessed January 6, 2006].
Excerpts from the Declaration of Independence will be used to show students what rights and privileges the colonists wanted for themselves.
Copy of Maryland Constitution. http://www.mdarchives.us/msa/mdmanual/43const/html/const.html [accessed November 7, 2006].
Excerpts from the Maryland Constitution will be used to show students the basis of our government; students will also examine the document for any references to slavery.
Library of Congress: American Memory. "A Picture of Slavery for Youth." Slaves and the Courts, 1740-1860. http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=lst_gcmisc&fileName=lst/lst0049//gcmisclst0049.db&recNum=0 [accessed January 3, 2006].
A Picture of Slavery for Youth identifies the mistreatment of African Americans in the time of slavery, as well as showing that slaves were also abused by not only their male masters, but females also. This document shows the students that African Americans had it very hard as slaves, and were sometimes punished for the littlest things.
Slaves and the Courts, 1740-1860
contains just over a hundred pamphlets and books (published between 1772 and 1889) concerning the difficult and troubling experiences of African and African-American slaves in the American colonies and the United States. The documents, most from the Law Library and the Rare Book and Special Collections Division of the Library of Congress, comprise an assortment of trials and cases, reports, arguments, accounts, examinations of cases and decisions, proceedings, journals, a letter, and other works of historical importance. Of the cases presented here, most took place in America and a few in Great Britain. Among the voices heard are those of some of the defendants and plaintiffs themselves as well as those of abolitionists, presidents, politicians, slave owners, fugitive and free territory slaves, lawyers and judges, and justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.