Probability & Statistics Day 2012 Group Photo
PROBABILITY & STATISTICS DAY
Funded By: National Security Agency | Hosted By: Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Consulting
Group Photo from the 7th Annual Probability & Statistics Day at UMBC 2013
8th Annual April 18-19, 2014

Register A special feature of Probability and Statistics Day at UMBC 2014 is that the conference, including the workshop, is open to all statistics graduate students from UMBC and local universites free of charge; however, REGISTRATION IS REQUIRED! The deadline to register is Friday, April 11, 2014.   // REGISTER NOW

For more information, contact any member of the organizing committee:

Bimal Sinha
Conference Chair
443.538.3012

Kofi Adragni
  410.455.2406
Yvonne Huang
  410.455.2422
Yaakov Malinovsky
  410.455.2968
Thomas Mathew
  410.455.2418
Nagaraj Neerchal
  410.455.2437
DoHwan Park
  410.455.2408
Junyong Park
  410.455.2407
Anindya Roy
  410.455.2435
Elizabeth Stanwyck
  410.455.5731

Sponsor

Participant Information

Anjana Grandhi

Poster: Multiple Testing Procedures for Hierarchically Structured Families of Hypotheses

We develop a mixed directional false discovery rate (mdFDR) controlling procedure in the context of Uterine Fibroid gene expression data (Davis et al., 2013). The main question of interest that arises in this research is to find out which genes are associated with onset, growth and size of tumor and find the trends in mean gene expressions across several categories of size or tumor, location etc. To answer these questions we formulate a three-stage testing problem and propose a general procedure that can be used with any mixed directional familywise error rate (mdFWER) controlling procedure for each gene, while controlling mdFDR as the overall error rate. We prove that our procedure controls mdFDR when the underlying test statistics are independent across the genes. We report the results of a simulation study evaluating the performance of the procedure under independence and dependence of the underlying test statistics relative to the procedure in Guo et al. (2010). We then develop methodology based on the general procedure in the context of uterine fibroid gene expression data discussed in Davis et al. (2013) and compare the results.