Tim Watkins wakes up at noon, glances at the chronometer and sighs. He sits down at his desk,
puts on his comm-glasses and his terminal hums to life, and he begins downloading the day's class
material into his brain. In 15 minutes, Tim inputs the answers to a math quiz before a flash warning
appears on the display projected on the surface of his lenses: "Tim Watkins--report to advisor robot
X-51 for counseling. Your grades have dropped .32 units since yesterday's download." Tim removes his
glasses and heads out the door and is greeted by the weather control system's version of a cool fall
day.
Just science fiction? Perhaps, but as we face the dawn of a new millennium, we also face an
uncertain future in the halls of academia. The growing influence of advanced technology and the
Internet are changing the face of education, and 50 years down the road, we might see a form of
academic instruction never before imagined: a world of long-distance, networked class presentations
linked by an advanced Internet or perhaps a multimedia cornucopia of courses accessible from a
student's own home. But will the need for a campus itself remain if students can simply download
their classes or work entirely online? What do the next 50 years hold for education?
"It's breathtaking when you think about it," says Diane Lee, vice provost for Student Academic
Affairs. She sees the future blending technology with a new sense of community, and she sees it
happening here at UMBC. "It's a scary thought, but if you look at where technology could take us,
why ever go to campus again? You can have virtual classrooms with people from all around the globe.
Our challenge is to take these technological advances and use them to build community, not destroy
it. Screens and interfaces might be considered a kind of shared humanity, but the campus provides a
reason to venture out, respond to education and express something about our humanity."
Lee's vision of a 21st century campus designed to provide access to technology while enhancing
opportunities for human interaction within a diverse community is shared by others, including Tim
Finin, computer science professor, who also sees a need to preserve what he calls the human factor.
Finin suggests that the social aspect of education is essential to the learning process. "Education
isn't about transferring content from my mind to your mind."
"It's about motivating students and inspiring them. That's difficult to achieve unless there's
a physical presence in the same room. As a professor, I also enjoy the relationships with colleagues
and students. I can't imagine just producing training material over the web or video camera."
Jay Freyman, ancient studies professor and director of the Honors College, is another
champion of the human factor. "Is not a liberal arts education supposed to prepare humans to be
the best humans their potential will allow, to think and express themselves effectively? The minute
that electronic interface is intruded into liberal education an element of the non-human is injected.
I'm not sure that the ambiguities which pervade the human condition can be properly taught without
human-to-human interaction."
Perhaps the real issue is that technology has not yet caught up to educational needs, but it's
getting there. "It took 40 years to develop the paper clip," Finin says, "so it may take some time
to develop some of the sophisticated things we can so easily imagine, like physical robots or
intelligent software agents that can converse fluently in natural language about a wide variety of
topics," Finin says. "Fifty years from now any information someone wants will be available on
whatever the Internet turns into, but education will still be sending kids to a classroom with a
human teacher who can inspire them."
Sending those students to class may also take on new wrinkles, at least according to Freyman.
"We may have a great need for education in the future to take the place of work as a socially
organizing force. How about paying people to go to college? I know there's a considerable amount
of scholarship money given to students now, but that's in anticipation of an economic return to
society later on. What if people were paid to go to school simply because it is good for
our culture?"
Education will no doubt evolve as we move into the 21st century, taking advantage of the
technologies that are even now available, but the need to interact with other people will always
remain a vital part of our academic environment. "Some people say artificial realities will approach
a point when you can't tell the difference between reality and fantasy," Finin says, "but I don't
think that will happen in my lifetime." Perhaps that's wishful thinking, or perhaps Finin is acutely
aware of a fundamental need we all share. Nevertheless, educators remain optimistic about the future,
envisioning a transformed campus that is technologically sophisticated but still very human.
"We're building an infrastructure for tomorrow," Lee asserts, "incorporating multimedia and
interactive technology. We've always stressed interdisciplinarity at UMBC, and that will serve us
well in reinventing the university for the new millennium, making it a place that builds the whole
person."
Arnold T. Blumberg is editor of the Overstreet Comic Book Price Guide and Turning
Pages and the book editor for EON Magazine.