Untitled Document

Comparative Data- UMBC versus other institutions:

Beginning in Fall 2008, UMBC peer data tables are based on the 2005 Carnegie Classification system. Detailed tables compare UMBC to the 2005 Basic groups of Research-High and Research-Very High institutions, as well as our ten Performance Peers, our Aspirational Peers, and our Funding Peers as identified for funding guidelines.

Student Enrollment
| Fall 2007 |
Faculty / Staff (data reported every two years)
- Summary Data | Fall 2007 |
- By Employee Category | Fall 2007 |
Degrees Awarded | FY 2007 |
IPEDS Graduation Rate Survey | FY 2007 |
Financial Data (prior years' data not shown due to changes in reporting standards beginning in FY 02)
- Revenues
  - Public Using GASB 34/35 Reporting Standards | FY 2007 |
  - Private or Public Using FASB Reporting Standards | FY 2007 |
- Expenditures
  - Public Using GASB 34/35 Reporting Standards | FY 2007 |
  - Private or Public Using FASB Reporting Standards | FY 2007 |
- Scholarships and Grants by Source
  - Public Using GASB 34/35 Reporting Standards | FY 2007 |
  - Private or Public Using FASB Reporting Standards | FY 2007 |
U.S. News Data
| Fall 2007 - 09 Issue |

	UMBC Current Peers	UMBC Aspirational Peers
	University of Arkansas	University of Connecticut
	University of California - Riverside	Georgia Institute of Technology
	University of California - Santa Cruz	University of Pittsburgh
	Clemson University	Stony Brook University - State University of New York
	University of Massachusetts- Amherst
	Mississippi State University
	New Jersey Institute of Technology
	Oklahoma State University
	University of Rhode Island
	University of Wyoming

Carnegie Foundation Web site
Archive Data for 2000 Carnegie Classification