
PROCEDURES
FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND REVIEW OF CENTERS,
INSTITUTES,
LABORATORIES, AND SIMILAR GROUPS
From time to time, University personnel seek to establish
informal and formal relationships for the purposes of conducting research,
enhancing teaching, and providing public service. The creation of such cooperative entities is encouraged as
being consistent with the mission and spirit of UMBC. This policy is not intended to include internal service
centers such as the Advisement Center or Counseling Center.
Centers, Institutes, Laboratories, and similar groups and
organizations form the
useful devices for organizing faculty and staff from different
disciplines to focus
on teaching, research, and/or service in an area of common interest.
Centers
and similar groups should be justified based on their contribution to
specified
missions of research and service and by their relationship to
instructional
programs at the institution.
UMBC
PROCEDURES
Group
The first, and simplest type of unit is called a Group.
The Group is organized on an ad hoc basis to
prepare a proposal or to conduct a specific project.
The duration for the organization of the Group is limited to the life
of the project or assignment. No
formal procedure is involved in the establishment of a Group other than
written approval of the relevant department Chair and Dean.
If a Group involves personnel from multiple academic units, written
approval may be granted from the relevant Chairs, Dean(s) or supervisory
officer(s).
Departmental
Laboratories, Centers, and Institutes
Housed within departments and customarily involving one or two
principal investigators, Departmental Laboratories, Centers, and Institutes
are designed to provide a distinct identity to a focused research area or
topic of investigations. A
Departmental Laboratory, Center, or Institute may have a director, associated
staff, and an operating budget; however, because of its size, mission, and
function, it is an integral part of the academic department and therefore
reports to the Chair of the relevant department.
The department itself serves as home for the Departmental Laboratory,
Center, or Institute, to nurture and support the management of its operations.
As with Groups, no formal procedure is required to establish a
Departmental Laboratory, Center, or Institute other than written approval of the
relevant department Chair and Dean. In
cases where faculty seek to establish a small Laboratory, Center, or Institute
that would involve faculty from more than one department, but would in all
likelihood not be able to be financially self-supporting, approval may be
granted by the Chairs of the host departments who will undertake responsibility
for the management of the unit, together with the written consent of the
relevant Dean(s) or supervisory officer(s).
Reporting and review of these departmentally affiliated units shall be
conducted within the regular departmental and academic program review processes.
When a Departmental Laboratory, Center, or Institute anticipates engaging
UMBC resources beyond those within the jurisdiction of the department(s)--
including space, equipment, or staff support, in addition to the appropriate
administrative review, the matter should be forwarded to the Academic Planning
and Budget Committee (APB) for timely discussion, with a recommendation to the
Faculty Senate. Identification of
how the unit addresses UMBC’s mission should be delineated. Should UMBC
resources be forthcoming to assist the departmentally-based unit, then the
Director of the unit will be obligated to complete a brief annual report which
includes a description of the UMBC resources assigned to the unit (e.g., space,
funding, faculty and staff, overhead support), the benefits derived from this
investment, and the continued relationship of the unit’s activities to the
UMBC mission. The format for the
annual report will be distributed by the Office of the Provost in April of each
year. In addition to the distribution of a completed annual report to the
relevant UMBC administrators, the report will be sent to the UMBC Research
Council, the APB Committee, and the Faculty Senate.
When a Departmental Center or Institute has grown sufficiently and seeks
to operate as its own administrative unit outside of a department, it may apply
to become a free-standing UMBC Center or Institute.
UMBC
Centers and Institutes
UMBC Centers or Institutes are comparable to an academic program without
departmental status. They may involve both external and State funding and may
appear as organized units in the working budget.
Headed by a Director, they have a formal administrative structure
designating clear reporting lines to a Dean or supervisory officer.
Centers and Institutes may be supported by general funds, but in most
cases, they are designed to attract external resources.
Customarily, Centers and Institutes are designed be responsive to
societal needs and are therefore able to attract external funds.
Often, they are self-supporting units and will follow standard campus
procedures in establishing and managing fiscal accounts.
As comparatively independent and flexible units, Centers and Institutes
must establish and have approved by the UMBC President, a formal proposal that
outlines need, mission, governance, proposed activities, reporting lines,
personnel involved and space required, total resources involved (including
start-up costs, long-term costs, administrative costs, etc.), and appointment
procedures for its respective Director. All
UMBC Centers and Institutes are to establish an Advisory Board and promulgate a
set of by-laws. Membership of the
Advisory Board must consist of at least two or more tenure-track UMBC faculty
who are not part of the administrative structure of the unit.
All academic units that seek to be formally designated as UMBC Centers
and Institutes are to submit a proposal for sequential review and endorsement to
the department(s) whose faculty, space, and other resources are involved, to the
Dean(s) or appropriate supervisory officer, the Provost, and final action by the
UMBC President. Absent
extraordinary circumstances, a full written proposal for a UMBC Center or
Institute that includes university resources such as (but not limited to) space,
faculty lines, or administrative overhead, shall be forwarded to the President
of the Faculty Senate for timely review and comment by the APB Committee and the
Faculty Senate prior to approval by the UMBC President.
Authorization for final approval rests with the UMBC President.
The UMBC President shall report the establishment of each new UMBC Center
or Institute to the USM Chancellor and the Board of Regents.
Centers and Institutes are required by the USM to prepare an annual
report and will participate in a periodic review based on a seven-year cycle.
Annual reports and periodic review reports will be distributed to the
relevant academic administrators and will be disseminated to the Research
Council, APB Committee, and the Faculty Senate. The format for the annual report will be distributed by the
Office of the Provost in April of each year.
The units will be asked to include in their annual report a statement of
the UMBC Center or Institute’s goals and objectives for the academic year
about to be completed, the extent to which those objectives have been
accomplished– including quantitative measures where possible (e.g., activities
undertaken; academic productivity including: numbers of journal papers, books,
and conference presentations; numbers and types of grants; overhead generated;
individuals served; community impact; personnel; national awards), UMBC resources assigned to the unit (e.g.,
space, funding, faculty and staff, overhead support), opportunities and
challenges faced by the unit, the relationship of the unit’s activities to the
UMBC mission, and goals and objectives for the upcoming year.
The periodic review of UMBC Centers and Institutes will parallel the
structure and standards of the periodic review undertaken by graduate programs
and will include an external, independent, nationally-recognized, visitation
team with expertise in the areas of teaching, research, or service allied with
the mission of the Institute or Center. The
review will be conducted by the Graduate School in consultation with the office
in which the Center resides. The review report will provide independent feedback
based on the contribution of the Center or Institute to the specified teaching,
research, or service mission at UMBC.
Approved
by Faculty Senate, 9/12/00