The Democrats' Digest, UMBC College Democrats' online newsletter featuring insightful commentary from our members. Check back often for new articles.


Dereliction of Democracy
How the Bush Administration is Trying to Lose Iraq

by Sam John

The Washington Post reported on April 5 that the Bush Administration plans to drastically cut funding for democracy-promotion programs in Iraq. Funding for Iraq's reconstruction will be further tilted toward "bringing more order and helping Iraqis run effective ministries." This is unwelcome news for both Americans and Iraqis and damning evidence of this Administration's incompetence.

The security situation in Iraq has fluctuated over the past three years, but not yet descended into anarchic violence. However, such a conclusion to the intervention is likely, and for that the Bush Administration bears responsibility. Had Defense Secretary Rumsfeld followed a doctrine of using overwhelming military force in Iraq, meaning boots on the ground, rather than satisfying his fetish for hi-tech weapons, the political outcome in Iraq might not be so precarious.

President Bush’s original aversion to nation-building was cited by his political opponents as evidence that his convictions were flimsy. Inchoate as the Administration’s initial foreign policy was, by promoting American values with American power, it grasped onto the strongest features of this nation. Any charge of hypocrisy rightly begins there, where the Administration negligently abandoned the most valuable principles in this war.
April 2006 Articles

Dereliction of Democracy: How the Bush Administration is Trying to Lose Iraq
by Sam John
April 17, 2006

South Dakota’s Draconian Abortion Law
by Kristen Hayden
April 17, 2006

Racism in the Name of Security
by Greg Winger
April 17, 2006

Without Dignity, Without Choice
by Ryan Walden
April 17, 2006

Archive

Among the programs set to expire are party-building organizations and the Iraq Civil Society and Media Program. This second institution was responsible for the Iraqi National News Agency—the “first independent news agency in the Arab world.” That is a remarkable accomplishment in itself, but like elections it is a first and not a last step toward securing Iraq’s future. While the United States cuts funding for political parties and civil society groups, Shiite cleric Moqtada Sadr is gloating over our hypocrisy and recruiting discontents to fire upon American soldiers. There is little reason for Iraqis to trust American values if the President displays so little confidence in them.

Critics of these criticisms, an awfully hard bunch to please, counter that the Bush Administration cannot be blamed for the acts of Islamists seeking to abort liberty in Iraq. Yet this vile ideology, arguably the region's most plentiful and profitless export, must be countered with more than platitudes and a smug attitude about historical inevitability. American scholar Francis Fukuyama has publicly renounced his own belief in such outcomes, joining a growing list of defectors from this President’s Iraq policy.

Having lived (though mostly having died) in Saddam Hussein's vacuum, Iraqis are starved for true political engagement. America must aggressively promote the same values that animate our dynamic society. While Iraq has begun to emerge under a new constitution, the President is ignoring the finest principles in our own. The Bush Administration has ceded much ground to Islamists in its neglect of making the case for liberal democracy. President Bush cannot be blamed for Islamism, but should be held accountable for failing to fight it. This latest misstep in a series of blunders is the most impeachable of offenses.