Search
Recent Posts
- ChangingAging.org Redesign -- Please Bookmark!
- Disaster in Buffalo
- Power Up Friday
- Blanchard WinsDays
- Kevin Frick writes...
- Monkhouse Monday
- Getting Closer!
- Blanchard WinsDays
- Power Up Friday
- My Pick for Health and Human Services
- Understanding Health Care Reform
- Facts Are Stubborn Things: Social Security Edition
- Monkhouse Monday
- Localism is Coming
- Krugman Can't Wait...
Recent Comments
Category Archives
- AGING 100
- Aging
- Culture
- Dementia
- Eden Alternative
- Erickson School
- Green House
- Health Policy
- Longevity
- Media
- Rockets
Monthly Archives
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
Subscribe to this blog's feed
AnnouncementsBlog Data
« Talking Head--- BT | Main | Attempted Live Blogging »
October 23, 2008 |Permalink |Comments (0)
More on Elderspeak
The New York Times recently ran a story on "Elderspeak." I agreed with the report's conclusion which showed that "being talked down to" damaged the self image of older people exposed to such language. The trouble is that I am also keen on rescuing the word "Elder" contamination by negative images of aging.
So... I am not too happy with the term being used in this way. After all, the Elders are not using this speech. It is employed by younger people.
* Using a singsong voice, changing pitch and tone, exaggerating words.
* Simplifying the length and complexity of sentences.
* Speaking more slowly.
* Using limited vocabulary.
* Repeating or paraphrasing what has just been said.
* Using terms like "honey" or "dear."
* Using statements that sound like questions.
This led me to look deeper into these kinds of communications. I stumbled upon "communicative predicament of aging." I'll be posting more on that predicament later this week.